Chapter 6 Enginereing Sustainability: Life Cycle Assessment#

  1. Introduction: Life Cycle Assessment

  2. Simulation: Life Cycle Assessment

  3. Self-Assessment

1. Introduction#

Descriptive alt text for accessibility

Fig. 44 **Figure 6.11 **: Components of Life Cycle Assessment#

🌍 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)#

🧭 Definition#

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a systematic method for evaluating the environmental impacts associated with all stages of a product’s life—from raw material extraction to disposal or recycling. It helps identify opportunities to improve sustainability across the supply chain.


🧩 Core Components (ISO 14040/14044)#

  1. Goal and Scope Definition

    • Define purpose, system boundaries, and functional unit

    • Identify intended audience and application

  2. Life Cycle Inventory (LCI)

    • Quantify inputs (materials, energy) and outputs (emissions, waste) for each stage

  3. Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA)

    • Translate inventory data into impact categories (e.g., climate change, eutrophication)

  4. Interpretation

    • Analyze results, identify hotspots, and recommend improvements


🔄 Types of Life Cycle Models#

Model

Description

Cradle-to-Grave

Full cycle: raw materials → production → use → disposal

Cradle-to-Gate

Partial cycle: raw materials → production (excludes use/disposal)

Cradle-to-Cradle

Circular model: materials reused or recycled indefinitely

Gate-to-Gate

Focus on a single process or facility

Well-to-Wheel

Used in fuel systems: extraction → vehicle use

Economic IO-LCA

Uses economic data to estimate impacts when specific data is unavailable


🌱 Importance in Sustainable Development#

  • Supports SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption) and SDG 13 (Climate Action)

  • Avoids burden shifting across life cycle stages

  • Enables eco-design, green procurement, and policy development

  • Informs Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) and carbon footprinting


♻️ Cradle-to-Cradle vs Cradle-to-Gate#

Aspect

Cradle-to-Cradle

Cradle-to-Gate

Scope

Full circular loop: reuse/remanufacture/recycle

Up to factory gate: excludes use and disposal

Goal

Eliminate waste, promote circular economy

Focus on production efficiency

Use Case

Circular product design, long-term sustainability

Initial footprinting, EPDs

Certification

C2C Certified™ (material health, reuse, energy, etc.)

Often used in ISO-compliant LCAs


🧠 Types of LCA Studies#

Type

Purpose

Attributional LCA

Describes current environmental flows within a system

Consequential LCA

Evaluates future impacts of decisions or changes

Comparative LCA

Compares two products/processes under consistent boundaries

Optimized LCA

Assesses improvements over baseline designs

Social LCA

Evaluates social and socio-economic impacts across life cycle

Life Cycle Costing (LCC)

Adds economic dimension to LCA (e.g., total cost of ownership)

LCSA

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: integrates environmental, social, and economic aspects


📘 Summary#

Life Cycle Assessment is a powerful tool for quantifying environmental impacts, guiding sustainable design, and supporting policy and product innovation. Whether used for cradle-to-gate footprinting or cradle-to-cradle circularity, LCA enables informed decisions aligned with global sustainability goals.

References#

[Hauschild et al., 2018] is widely regarded as one of the most comprehensive and pedagogically structured introductions to LCA. It covers: - History and context of LCA - Detailed methodology with evolving examples - Applications in energy, construction, transport, nanotech, and more - Advanced topics like prospective LCA, social LCA, and life cycle costing - Includes an LCA report template and full example report. []is the foundational international standard that defines the principles and framework for conducting a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) which provides a consistent structure for evaluating the environmental impacts of products, processes, or services across their entire life cycle.

Enhanced Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Simulation#

Overview#

This interactive model estimates the environmental impacts of a system, product, or project across its life cycle stages. It supports sustainability evaluation by calculating:

  • 🌍 Global Warming Potential (GWP) in kg CO₂-eq

  • 💧 Water Use in cubic meters (m³)

  • ⚡ Energy Consumption in megajoules (MJ)

  • 🧮 Carbon Footprint based on energy use and carbon intensity


Life Cycle Stages#

The model evaluates four key stages:

Stage

Description

Production

Raw material extraction and manufacturing

Transport

Delivery and logistics

Operation

Use-phase energy and resource consumption

End-of-Life

Disposal, recycling, or decommissioning

Each stage has default impact factors per unit, which are scaled by the system type and quantity.


Impact Calculations#

🔹 Global Warming Potential (GWP)#

\[ \text{GWP}_{\text{stage}} = \text{Units} \times \text{GWP Factor} \times \text{System Multiplier} \]

🔹 Water Use#

\[ \text{Water}_{\text{stage}} = \text{Units} \times \text{Water Factor} \times \text{System Multiplier} \]

🔹 Energy Consumption#

\[ \text{Energy}_{\text{stage}} = \text{Units} \times \text{Energy Factor} \times \text{System Multiplier} \]

🔹 Carbon Footprint#

\[ \text{Carbon}_{\text{stage}} = \text{Energy}_{\text{stage}} \times \text{Carbon Intensity (kg CO₂/MJ)} \]

Interactive Controls#

  • Units: Quantity of the system being evaluated

  • System Type: Infrastructure, Consumer Product, Energy System, Water Treatment

  • Carbon Intensity: Emissions per MJ of energy (adjustable for renewable vs fossil sources)

  • Plot Toggle: Show/hide bar chart visualization


Visualization#

The model displays a grouped bar chart showing impact per stage for:

  • GWP (kg CO₂-eq)–Water Use (m³)- Energy (MJ) - Carbon Footprint (kg CO₂)

This helps identify which stages dominate environmental impacts and where improvements can be made.

Use Cases#

  • Sustainability screening of engineering projects

  • Comparative analysis of product designs

  • Educational tool for life cycle thinking

  • Sensitivity testing for carbon intensity scenarios

  • Supporting LEED, Envision, or ISO 14040/44 assessments


References#

  • ISO 14040: Environmental Management — Life Cycle Assessment

  • U.S. EPA Life Cycle Assessment Framework

  • GHG Protocol Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard

2. Simulation#

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import ipywidgets as widgets
from IPython.display import display, clear_output

# 📦 Default impact factors per stage (per unit)
impact_factors = {
    "Production": {"GWP": 100, "Water": 5, "Energy": 800},
    "Transport": {"GWP": 20, "Water": 1, "Energy": 100},
    "Operation": {"GWP": 50, "Water": 3, "Energy": 500},
    "End-of-Life": {"GWP": 30, "Water": 2, "Energy": 200}
}

# 🔁 System multipliers
system_multipliers = {
    "Infrastructure": 1.0,
    "Consumer Product": 0.6,
    "Energy System": 1.2,
    "Water Treatment": 1.1
}

# 🌿 Main LCA evaluation function
def evaluate_lca(units, system_type, carbon_intensity, show_plot):
    clear_output(wait=True)

    multiplier = system_multipliers[system_type]
    stages = list(impact_factors.keys())
    gwp = []
    water = []
    energy = []
    carbon_footprint = []

    for stage in stages:
        gwp_val = units * impact_factors[stage]["GWP"] * multiplier
        water_val = units * impact_factors[stage]["Water"] * multiplier
        energy_val = units * impact_factors[stage]["Energy"] * multiplier
        carbon_val = energy_val * carbon_intensity

        gwp.append(gwp_val)
        water.append(water_val)
        energy.append(energy_val)
        carbon_footprint.append(carbon_val)

    # 📊 Plot results
    if show_plot:
        x = np.arange(len(stages))
        width = 0.2

        plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
        plt.bar(x - 1.5*width, gwp, width, label="GWP (kg CO₂-eq)", color="tomato")
        plt.bar(x - 0.5*width, water, width, label="Water Use (m³)", color="skyblue")
        plt.bar(x + 0.5*width, energy, width, label="Energy (MJ)", color="goldenrod")
        plt.bar(x + 1.5*width, carbon_footprint, width, label="Carbon Footprint (kg CO₂)", color="gray")
        plt.xticks(x, stages)
        plt.ylabel("Impact per Stage")
        plt.title(f"LCA Impact Evaluation — {system_type} ({units} units)")
        plt.legend()
        plt.grid(True)
        plt.tight_layout()
        plt.show()

    # 📋 Summary
    print(f"🔎 Total Impacts for {units} units of {system_type}:")
    print(f"🌍 GWP: {sum(gwp):.1f} kg CO₂-eq")
    print(f"💧 Water Use: {sum(water):.1f} m³")
    print(f"⚡ Energy Consumption: {sum(energy):.1f} MJ")
    print(f"🧮 Carbon Footprint (based on energy): {sum(carbon_footprint):.1f} kg CO₂")

# 🎛️ Interactive controls
units_slider = widgets.FloatSlider(value=10, min=1, max=100, step=1, description='Units')
system_dropdown = widgets.Dropdown(options=list(system_multipliers.keys()), value="Infrastructure", description='System Type')
carbon_slider = widgets.FloatSlider(value=0.25, min=0.1, max=1.0, step=0.05, description='CO₂/MJ')
plot_toggle = widgets.Checkbox(value=True, description='Show Plot')

interactive_lca = widgets.interactive(
    evaluate_lca,
    units=units_slider,
    system_type=system_dropdown,
    carbon_intensity=carbon_slider,
    show_plot=plot_toggle
)

display(interactive_lca)

3. Self-Assessment#

📘 Conceptual Questions#

These questions explore the modeling logic, assumptions, and physical meaning behind the LCA simulation.

Life Cycle Stages#

  • What are the four stages considered in this LCA model, and why are they important?

  • How do impact factors (GWP, water, energy) vary across life cycle stages?

  • Why is energy use converted to carbon footprint using a carbon intensity factor?

System Multipliers#

  • What does a system multiplier represent in the context of LCA?

  • How does changing the system type (e.g., infrastructure vs. consumer product) affect total impacts?

  • Why might an energy system have a higher multiplier than a consumer product?

Visualization & Interpretation#

  • What insights can be gained from comparing GWP, water use, energy, and carbon footprint across stages?

  • Why is it useful to visualize impacts per stage rather than just total values?

  • How could this model be adapted to include additional impact categories (e.g., land use, toxicity)?


Reflective Questions#

These questions encourage critical thinking and application to real-world sustainability decisions.

  • Which life cycle stage contributes most to the carbon footprint in your selected system, and why?

  • How would the results change if the carbon intensity of energy were reduced through renewables?

  • What are the trade-offs between reducing energy use and minimizing water consumption?

  • How could this model support product design or infrastructure planning for lower environmental impact?

  • What limitations exist in using fixed impact factors and multipliers for diverse real-world systems?


❓ Quiz Questions#

Multiple Choice#

  1. Which stage typically has the highest energy consumption in most systems?
    A. Production
    B. Transport
    C. Operation
    D. End-of-Life
    Answer: C

  2. If a system uses 500 MJ of energy and the carbon intensity is 0.25 kg CO₂/MJ, what is the carbon footprint?
    A. 125 kg CO₂
    B. 250 kg CO₂
    C. 500 kg CO₂
    D. 1000 kg CO₂
    Answer: B

  3. What does the system multiplier affect in the model?
    A. Only water use
    B. Only carbon footprint
    C. All impact categories proportionally
    D. Only production stage
    Answer: C

True/False#

  1. The model assumes impact factors are constant per unit across all systems.
    Answer: True

  2. Carbon footprint is calculated directly from GWP values.
    Answer: False

  3. Changing the number of units affects all impact categories linearly.
    Answer: True

Short Answer#

  1. Explain how the model calculates carbon footprint from energy consumption.
    Answer: It multiplies the energy used in each stage by the carbon intensity factor (kg CO₂/MJ).

  2. Why might the operation stage dominate the total impact for an energy system?
    Answer: Because energy systems often have high ongoing energy use, which drives both energy consumption and carbon emissions.